Pj. Blanchard et al., The influence of the proportion of Duroc genes on growth, carcass and porkeating quality characteristics, ANIM SCI, 68, 1999, pp. 495-501
A study Ic,as carried out involving 721 pigs, comprising boars and gilts, w
ith either 0, 0.25, or 0.50 Duroc inclusion level, which were produced by m
ating Large White boars with Large White x British Landrace sows, Large Whi
te boars with Duroc x (Large White x British Landrace) sows, or Duroc boars
with Large White x British Landrace sows, respectively Animals were reared
on one of seven different feeding regimens from 30 to 90 kg live weight. T
issue growth rates were determined using a triple sampling procedure based
on a combination of full-side and ham joint dissection on subsamples of pig
s (127 and 366 rigs, respectively) and P-2 backfat thickness on the remaind
er. Initial body composition was determined at 30 kg on subsamples of the t
hree genotypes. Daily food intakes increased with increasing Duroc inclusio
n but live-weight gains were similar for the three genotypes. Lean and fat
growth rates and food conversion ratios were greatest for the 0.50 Duroc gr
oup, although the genotype differences were small. Killing-out proportions
and P-2 fat depths were higher for the 0.25 and 0.50 Duroc groups. The prop
ortion of lean in the carcass was lower (P < 0.01)for 0.50 Duroc pigs. Japa
nese colour scores and EEL reflectance indicated that the longissimus muscl
e was darker for the 0.25 and 0 50 Duroc genotypes. Subcutaneous fat firmne
ss scores and penetrometer readings taken in the mid back indicated softer
fat for the O Duroc group. Intramuscular fat levels increased (P < 0.01) wi
th increasing Duroc inclusion (10.4, 11.2, and 18.2 g.kg for the 0, 0.25, a
nd 0 50 groups respectively). Cooked longissimus from pigs with 0 50 Duroc
had a lower shear force and was judged to have a stronger pork odour and to
be more tender and acceptable than that from the 0 Duroc group. The 0.25 D
uroc group showed a small improvement in tenderness but a weaker pork odour
and similar overall acceptability compared with the 0 Duroc group. This st
udy suggests that the use of the Duroc in crossing systems in the United Ki
ngdom will have limited impact on growth performance but that 0.50 Duroc in
clusion will result in fatter carcasses, higher intramuscular fat levels an
d improved eating quality.