P. Geoffroy et al., Clinical comparability of albuterol delivered by the breath-actuated inhaler (Spiros (R)) and albuterol by MDI in patients with asthma, ANN ALLER A, 82(4), 1999, pp. 377-382
Study objective: This study compares the efficacy and safety of one and two
actuations of albuterol sulfate powder delivered via a breath-actuated, ef
fort-assisted, investigational inhaler (Spiros(R), Dura Pharmaceuticals, In
c) and albuterol delivered via a conventional propellant-driven metered dos
e inhaler (Ventolin(R) Glare, Inc).
Design: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 5-way crossover study
.
Participants: Sixty patients with mild-to-moderate asthma (FEV1 59% predict
ed) were enrolled and 44 completed the study.
Measurements and results: FEV1 values over 6 hours were analyzed by ANCOVA
and the Finney relative potency model. The relative potency of the inhalers
(albuterol MDI: albuterol DPI) was 1.132 (90% CI, 0.680 to 2.252) indicati
ng 1.132 actuations of albuterol MDI provided the same bronchodilation as o
ne actuation of albuterol DPI. ANCOVA analyses further indicated that there
were no significant differences between the two delivery systems with resp
ect to FEV1, FVC, FEF25-75% or PEF. Both inhalers had similar effects on se
rum potassium levels, QTc interval, blood pressure, and heart rate.
Conclusions: In patients with mild-to-moderate asthma in this study, the al
buterol DPI was determined to be therapeutically comparable to albuterol MD
I in the delivery of one and two actuations of albuterol.