Fifty-eight previously paired cockatiels were force-re-paired based on bree
ding history to determine the relationship between reproductive experience
and nesting success. Males (M) and females (F) were assigned a breeding his
tory that was 'experienced' (E) or 'inexperienced' (I), depending on whethe
r they were part of a pair that had hatched at least one egg during the pas
t two breeding trials. Re-pairing resulted in four groups designated EMEF,
EMIF, IMEF, and IMIF. Nesting success was defined as incidence of, or laten
cy to, nest inspection, nest-bowl formation, and egg laying, as well as hat
chability of eggs. Additionally, age, pre-laying nestbox occupancy, and rel
ative cage height were evaluated for relationship to nesting success. Eight
weeks after re-pairing, birds were exposed to environmental stimuli for br
eeding, and nestboxes were checked daily for evidence of nest inspection, b
owl formation, oviposition, and hatching. Videocameras recorded nestbox occ
upancy for 4 h every other day. Overall, groups differed significantly in t
he number of pairs that inspected nests and formed bowls; nest inspection w
as lowest for LMIF, and bowl formation was highest for EMEF. When groups we
re combined based on male breeding history, significantly more EM than IM i
nspected nests and formed bowls. Comparing groups based on female breeding
history, significantly more EF than IF inspected nests and formed bowls. On
ly EF laid eggs, and mates of EF's that laid spent significantly more pre-l
ay time in the nestbox than did mates of EF's that didn't lay. Pairs in ele
vated cages inspected nests and initiated clutches significantly more than
did lower tier pairs. Results of this study should be useful to aviculturis
ts trying to select bird combinations and aviary design to maximize product
ivity. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. AU rights reserved.