Improving the letters we write: an exploration of doctor-doctor communication in cancer care

Citation
D. Mcconnell et al., Improving the letters we write: an exploration of doctor-doctor communication in cancer care, BR J CANC, 80(3-4), 1999, pp. 427
Citations number
11
Categorie Soggetti
Oncology,"Onconogenesis & Cancer Research
Journal title
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
ISSN journal
00070920 → ACNP
Volume
80
Issue
3-4
Year of publication
1999
Database
ISI
SICI code
0007-0920(199905)80:3-4<427:ITLWWA>2.0.ZU;2-S
Abstract
Referral and reply letters are common means by which doctors exchange infor mation pertinent to patient care. Twenty-eight semistructured interviews we re conducted exploring the views of oncologists, referring surgeons and gen eral practitioners. Twenty-seven categories of information in referral lett ers and 32 in reply letters after a consultation were defined. The letters to and from six medical oncologists relating to 20 consecutive new patients were copied, and their content analysed. Oncologists, surgeons and general practitioners Australia wide were surveyed using questionnaires developed on data obtained above. Only four of 27 categories of referral information appear regularly (in > 50%) in referral letters. Oncologists want most to r eceive information regarding the patient's medical status, the involvement of other doctors, and any special considerations. Referring surgeons and fa mily doctors identified delay in receiving the consultant's reply letter as of greatest concern, and insufficient detail as relatively common problems . Reply letters include more information regarding patient history/backgrou nd than the recipients would like. Referring surgeons and family doctors wa nt information regarding the proposed treatment. expected outcomes, and any psychosocial concerns, yet these items are often omitted. Consultants and referring doctors need to review, and modify their letter writing practices .