Aims The eye-blink response following sudden acoustic noise bursts is part
of the startle reflex. The magnitude of the startle response can be attenua
ted by presentation of a weak stimulus before the 'startle-eliciting' stimu
lus (prepulse inhibition, PPI). PPI is a stable finding in awake humans but
may be altered by anaesthetic drugs. We investigated whether the applicati
on of benzodiazepines altered the magnitude of PPI in healthy male voluntee
rs.
Methods In an open-label noncontrolled investigation, the effect of the ben
zodiazepine agonist midazolam on PPI was assessed in the absence and presen
ce of the antagonist flumazenil. After an initial control period of 60 min
three consecutive periods, each of 60 min, with progressively increasing co
ncentrations of midazolam were studied (0.02, 0.06, 0.14 mg kg(-1) h(-1)).
A final 60 min period during the administration of flumazenil (0.004 mg kg(
-1) h(-1)) and while the agonist was still present was also studied. Drug w
as administered intravenuously as a combination of bolus, 50% of total dose
and continuous infusion over the 60 min period. Electromyographic (EMG) re
sponse of the light orbicularis oculi muscle was used to assess the startle
response to noise bursts of 50 ms duration (95 dB(A)). Noise bursts were r
andomly preceded by nonstartling prepulses (800 Hz sinus, 50 ms duration, 6
5 dB(A), prepulse to noise interval 120 ms). The magnitude of PPI was calcu
lated by dividing the EMG response to nonprepulsed stimuli by the response
to prepulsed stimuli for each individual and period. Eleven subjects partic
ipated in the study, two of them were excluded from the statistical analysi
s because startle responses could not be reliably elicited (final sample si
ze n=9).
Results The magnitude of PPI was inversely related to the concentration of
midazolam. This relationship was described by a sigmoidal E-max model, givi
ng an E-max of 0.65+/-0.13, an ED50 of 33.9+/-10.9 ng ml(-1) and gamma of 3
.5+/-1.0. During infusion of flumazenil and in the presence of midazolam, t
he magnitude of PPI increased by 0.11 (95% CI, 0-0.22, P less than or equal
to 0.04), which is consistent with its mode of action as a benzodiazepine
antagonist.
Conclusions In healthy male volunteers the magnitude of PPI varies accordin
g to agonism and antagonism of benzodiazepine receptors, suggesting that th
e assessment of PPI may be potentially useful to monitor the sedative effec
t of benzodiazepines in the clinical setting.