Double blind, randomised study of continuous terbinafine compared with intermittent itraconazole in treatment of toenail onychomycosis

Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of continuous terbinafine with intermittent itraconazole in the treatment of toenail onychomycosis. Design Prospective, randomised, double blind, double dummy multicentre, par allel group study lasting 72 weeks. Setting 35 centres in sis European countries. Subjects 496 patients aged 18 to 75 years with a clinical and mycological d iagnosis of dermatophyte onychomycosis of the toenail. Interventions Study patients were randomly divided into four parallel group s to receive either terbinafine 250 mg a day for 12 or 16 weeks (groups T-1 2 and T-16) or itraconazole 400 mg a day for 1 week in every 4 weeks for 12 or 16 weeks (groups I-3 and I-4). Main outcome measures Assessment of primary efficacy at week 72 was mycolog ical cure, defined as negative results on microscopy and culture Of samples from the target toenail. Results At week 72 the mycological cure rates were 75.7% (81/107) in the T- 12 group and 80.8% (80/99) in the T-16 group compared with 38.3% (41/107) i n the I-3 group and 49.1% (53/105) in the I-3 group. All comparisons (T-12 vI(3), T-12 vI(4), T-10 vI(3), T-16 vI(4)) showed significantly higher cure rates in the terbinafine groups (all P < 0.0001). Also, all secondary clin ical outcome measures were significantly in favour of terbinafine at week 7 2. There were no differences in the number or type of adverse events record ed in the terbinafine or itraconazole groups. Conclusion Continuous terbinafine is significantly more effective than inte rmittent itraconazole in the treatment of patients with toenail onychomycos is.