Endurance testing of hip prostheses: a comparison between the load fixed in ISO 7206 standard and the physiological loads

Citation
M. Baleani et al., Endurance testing of hip prostheses: a comparison between the load fixed in ISO 7206 standard and the physiological loads, CLIN BIOMEC, 14(5), 1999, pp. 339-345
Citations number
22
Categorie Soggetti
Ortopedics, Rehabilitation & Sport Medicine
Journal title
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS
ISSN journal
02680033 → ACNP
Volume
14
Issue
5
Year of publication
1999
Pages
339 - 345
Database
ISI
SICI code
0268-0033(199906)14:5<339:ETOHPA>2.0.ZU;2-4
Abstract
Background. pre-clinical endurance validation of innovative hip prostheses femoral components are carried out following the ISO 7206 standard. The in vitro fatigue test must simulate accurately the physiological load to corre ctly define the section of the stem. Objective. This study investigates if the loads defined in the ISO 7206 sta ndard simulate correctly the physiological load that occur in vivo. Design. Simulation of the damage induced by in vitro test and in vivo loads is performed. Different designs of the stem are examined. Materials with d ifferent fatigue limit are considered. For the in vivo loads, different bod y weights are modelled. Methods. The minimal stem dimensions required to stand 20 years of patient use and to pass the fatigue test are calculated based on linear damage accu mulation. Results. The results show that the ISO load simulates reasonably well the p hysiological load that is likely to occur in active patients with a low or normal body weight. Conversely, the ISO test underestimates the physiologic al load that heavy and active patients are likely to apply to the implant. Conclusions. Different minimum requirements for endurance strength should b e fixed for hip prostheses designed for patients of different weight. This solution would reduce the risk of undersizing or oversizing the stem.