Patients' priorities with respect to general practice care: an international comparison

Citation
R. Grol et al., Patients' priorities with respect to general practice care: an international comparison, FAM PRACT, 16(1), 1999, pp. 4-11
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine
Journal title
FAMILY PRACTICE
ISSN journal
02632136 → ACNP
Volume
16
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Pages
4 - 11
Database
ISI
SICI code
0263-2136(199902)16:1<4:PPWRTG>2.0.ZU;2-I
Abstract
Background and objectives. Improving the sensitivity of general practice to patients' needs demands a good understanding of patients' expectations and priorities in care provision. Insight into differences in expectations of patients in different cultures and health care systems may support decision -making on desirable models for care provision in general practice. An inte rnational study was conducted to determine priorities of patients in genera l practice care: which views do patients in different countries have in com mon and which views differ? Methods. Written surveys in general practices in the UK, Norway, Sweden, De nmark, The Netherlands, Germany, Portugal and Israel were performed. Sample s of patients from at least 12 practices per country, stratified according to area and type of practice, were included. Patients rated the importance of 38 different aspects of general practice care, selected on the basis of literature analysis, qualitative studies and consensus discussions. Ranking s between countries were compared. Results. A total number of 3540 patients (response rate on average 55%) com pleted the questionnaire. Patients in different countries had many opinions in common. Aspects that got the highest ranking were: getting enough time during the consultation; quick services in case of emergencies;. confidenti ality of information on patients; telling patients all they want to know ab out their illness; making patients feel free to talk about their problems; GPs going to courses regularly; and offering preventive services. However, differences between opinions of patients in different countries were also f ound for some of the selected aspects. A confounding effect of patients' ch aracteristics may have played a role in these differences. Discussion. The study provides information on what patients expect of and v alue in general practice care. It shows that patients in different cultures and health care systems may have different views on some aspects of care, but most of all that: they have many views in common, particularly as far a s doctor-patient communication and accessibility of services are concerned.