Wu. Shipley et al., Radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer - A multi-institutional pooled analysis, J AM MED A, 281(17), 1999, pp. 1598-1604
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
General & Internal Medicine","Medical Research General Topics
Context Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) evaluation leads to the early detec
tion of both prostate cancer and recurrences following primary treatment. P
rostate-specific antigen outcome information on patients 5 or more years fo
llowing treatment is limited and available mainly as single-institution rep
orts.
Objectives To assess the likelihood and durability of tumor control using P
SA evaluation 5 or more years after radical external beam radiation therapy
and to identify pretreatment prognostic factors in men with early prostate
cancer treated since 1988, the PSA era.
Design and Setting Retrospective, nonrandomized, multi-institutional pooled
analysis of patients treated with external beam radiation therapy alone be
tween 1988 and 1995 at 6 US medical centers. Follow-up lasted up to a maxim
um of 9 years. Outcome data were analyzed using Cox regression and recursiv
e partitioning techniques.
Patients A total of 1765 men with stage T1b, T1c, and T2 tumors treated bet
ween 1988 and 1995 with external beam radiation. The majority (58%) of pati
ents were older than 70 years and 24.2% had initial PSA values of 20 ng/mL
or higher. A minimum of 2 years of subsequent follow-up was required for pa
rticipation,
Main Outcome Measure Actuarial estimates of freedom from biochemical failur
e.
Results The 5-year estimates of overall survival, disease-specific survival
, and the freedom from biochemical failure are 85.0% (95% confidence interv
al [CI], 82.5%-87.6%), 95.1% (95% CI, 94.0%-96.2%), and 65.8% (95% CI, 62.8
%-68.0%), respectively, The PSA failure-free rates 5 and 7 years after trea
tment for patients presenting with a PSA of less than 10 ng/mL were 77.8% (
95% CI, 74.5%-81.3%), and 72.9% (95% CI, 67.9%-78.2%). Recursive partitioni
ng analysis of initial PSA level, palpation stage, and the Gleason score gr
oupings yielded 4 separate prognostic groups: group 1, included patients wi
th a PSA level of less than 9.2 ng/mL; group 2, PSA level of at least 9.2 b
ut less than 19.7 ng/mL; group 3, PSA level at least 19.7 ng/mL and a Gleas
on score of 2 to 6; and group 4, PSA level of at least 19.7 ng/mL and a Gle
ason score of 7 to 10. The estimated rates of survival free of biochemical
failure at 5 years are 81% for group 1, 69% for group 2, 47% for group 3, a
nd 29% for group 4. Of the 302 patients followed up beyond 5 years who were
free of biochemical disease, 5.0% relapsed from the fifth to the eighth ye
ar,
Conclusions Estimated PSA control rates in this pooled analysis are similar
to those of single institutions. These rates indicate the probability of s
uccess for subsets of patients with tumors of several prognostic category g
roupings. These results represent a multi-institutional benchmark for evide
nce-based counseling of prostate cancer patients about radiation treatment.