J. Jakubik et J. Wess, Use of a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay strategy to study mechanisms of G protein-coupled receptor assembly, J BIOL CHEM, 274(3), 1999, pp. 1349-1358
All G protein-coupled receptors are predicted to consist of a bundle of sev
en transmembrane helices (I-VII) that are connected by various extracellula
r and intracellular loops. At present, little is known about the molecular
interactions that are critical for the proper assembly of the transmembrane
receptor core. To address this issue, we took advantage of the ability of
coexpressed N- and C-terminal m3 muscarinic receptor fragments to form func
tional receptor complexes (Schoneberg, T. Liu, J., and Wess, J. (1995) J. B
iol. Chem. 270, 18000-18006). As a model system, we used two polypeptides,
referred to, m3-trunk and m3-tail, that were generated by "splitting'' the
m3 muscarinic receptor within the third intracellular loop. We initially de
monstrated, by employing a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay strat
egy, that the two receptor fragments directly associate with each other whe
n coexpressed in COS-7 cells. Additional studies with N- and C terminal fra
gments derived from other G protein-coupled receptors showed that fragment
association was highly receptor-specific. In subsequent experiments, the sa
ndwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay system was used to identify amino
acids that are required for proper fragment (receptor) assembly. Point muta
tions were introduced into m3-trunk or m3-tail, and the ability of these mu
tations to interfere with efficient fragment assembly was examined. These s
tudies showed that three highly conserved proline residues (located in tran
smembrane helices V, VI, and VII) are essential for proper fragment associa
tion (receptor assembly). Interestingly, incubation with classical muscarin
ic agonists and antagonists or allosteric ligands led to significant increa
ses in the efficiency of fragment association (particularly upon substituti
on of the conserved proline residues), indicating that all of these ligands
can act as "anchors" between the m3-trunk and m3-tail fragments. The appro
ach described here should be generally applicable to gain deeper insight in
to the molecular mechanisms governing G protein-coupled receptor structure
and assembly.