Jm. Chen et al., Improved survival in patients with acute myocarditis using external pulsatile mechanical ventricular assistance, J HEART LUN, 18(4), 1999, pp. 351-357
Background: Acute myocarditis remains a disease with a variable clinical co
urse, from full ventricular recovery to complete heart failure; to date, fe
w cases have been reported that describe the efficacy of temporary mechanic
al ventricular assistance for its treatment.
Methods: We evaluated the voluntary world registry with the use of an exter
nal pulsatile ventricular assist device (the ABIOMED BVS 5000 [BVS]) for ac
ute myocarditis to determine the impact of mechanical ventricular assistanc
e on outcome. Variables analyzed included patient demographics, serum chemi
stries, and overall hemodynamics prior to BVS, while on BVS support, and af
ter BVS explanation. Postoperative parameters included re-operation, bleedi
ng, respiratory failure, renal failure, and infections, neurologic, or embo
lic events.
Results: Eighteen patients in the ABIOMED world registry underwent BVS impl
antation for myocarditis; 11 (61.1%) had complete pre-operative and hemodyn
amic data for analysis. Patients were supported for 13.2 +/- 17.0 days, aft
er which time 7 (63.6%) patients survived to explanation of the device and
2 (18.2%) underwent transplantation. Elevated admission serum chemistries b
lood ureanitrogen [BUN], creatinine, transaminases) and hemodynamics (centr
al venous pressure [CVP], mean pulmonary arterial pressure [PAP], pulmonary
capillary wedge pressure [PCW], cardiac index [CI], all normalized during
the period of device support. Estimated ejection fractions in the 7 explant
ed patients ranged between 50 to 60% at routine evaluation 3 years after de
vice removal.
Conclusions: Temporary mechanical ventricular assistance represents an effi
cacious therapy for acute myocarditis in patients with hemodynamic decompen
sation despite maximal medical therapy. Failure to achieve full ventricular
recovery while on device support still allows for other surgical alternati
ves, including implantation of a long-term implantable ventricular assist d
evice, or cardiac transplantation.