Comparison of effectiveness and required time of two surveillance methods in intensive care patients

Citation
A. Bouletreau et al., Comparison of effectiveness and required time of two surveillance methods in intensive care patients, J HOSP INF, 41(4), 1999, pp. 281-289
Citations number
30
Categorie Soggetti
Clinical Immunolgy & Infectious Disease
Journal title
JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION
ISSN journal
01956701 → ACNP
Volume
41
Issue
4
Year of publication
1999
Pages
281 - 289
Database
ISI
SICI code
0195-6701(199904)41:4<281:COEART>2.0.ZU;2-K
Abstract
The intensive care unit (ICU) standardized protocol of the NNIS (National N osocomial Infections Surveillance) system is a surveillance method of hospi tal acquired infections (HAI), which provides device-associated infection r ates. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and the require d time for data collection and analysis of a selective surveillance method (SSM) derived from the NNIS I:CU surveillance protocol, and to compare its data with that of a reference surveillance method (RSM). The sensitivity, s pecificity and the positive predictive value (PPV) of the RSM were 87.5, 10 0 and 100%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity and the PPV of the S SM were 59.4 97.6 and 79.2%, respectively. Considering device-related infec tions only (ventilator-related pneumonia, catheter-related urinary tract in fections, central line-related sepsis), the sensitivities of the RSM and th e SSM were 80.9 and 90.5%, respectively. The SSM required only one third of the time of the RSM (1.1 h and 3.4 h per 10 beds per week with the SSM and the RSM, respectively). We conclude that the SSM has a very high sensitivi ty for detecting device associated infections, but is not sensitive enough for surveying all types of HAI.