A brainstem stereotactic atlas in a three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging navigation system: first experiences with atlas-to-patient registration

Citation
K. Niemann et al., A brainstem stereotactic atlas in a three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging navigation system: first experiences with atlas-to-patient registration, J NEUROSURG, 90(5), 1999, pp. 891-901
Citations number
80
Categorie Soggetti
Neurology,"Neurosciences & Behavoir
Journal title
JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY
ISSN journal
00223085 → ACNP
Volume
90
Issue
5
Year of publication
1999
Pages
891 - 901
Database
ISI
SICI code
0022-3085(199905)90:5<891:ABSAIA>2.0.ZU;2-J
Abstract
Object. The authors describe a computer-resident digital representation of a stereotactic atlas of the human brainstem, its semiautomated registration to sagittal fast low-angle shot three-dimensional (3-D) magnetic resonance (MR) imaging data sets in 27 healthy volunteers and 24 neurosurgical patie nts, and an analysis of the subsequent transforms needed to refine the init ial registration. Methods. Contour drawings from the atlas, which offer the 70th percentile o f variation of anatomical structures, were interpolated into an isotropic 3 -D representation. Initial atlas-to-patient registration was based on the f astigium/ventricular floor plane reference system. The quality of the fit w as evaluated using superimposition of the atlas and MR images. If necessary , the atlas was tailored to the individual anatomy by using additional tran sforms. On average, the atlas had to be stretched by 2 to 6% in the three d irections of space. Scale factors varied over a broad range from -8 to +19% and the benefit of visual interactive control of the atlas-to-patient regi stration was evident. Analysis of distances within the pens measured in the midsagittal MR imaging slices and the required scale factors revealed sign ificant correlations that may be used to reduce the amount of user interact ion in the coregistration substantially. In 70.6% of the cases, the atlas h ad to be shifted in a cranial direction along the brainstem axis (in 25.5% of cases 3-4 mm, in 45.1% of cases 1-2 mm). This was due to a more caudal p osition of the fastigium cerebelli on the MR images compared with the atlas . Conclusions. This observation, in conjunction with the variability of the h eight of the fourth ventricle in our MR imaging data (range 6.1-15.2 mm, me an 10.1 mm, standard deviation 1.8 mm) calls into question the role of the fastigium cerebelli as an anatomical landmark for localization within the b rainstem.