Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization of four species of Glomus onphysiological responses of maize

Citation
A. Boucher et al., Effect of arbuscular mycorrhizal colonization of four species of Glomus onphysiological responses of maize, J PLANT NUT, 22(4-5), 1999, pp. 783-797
Citations number
37
Categorie Soggetti
Plant Sciences
Journal title
JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION
ISSN journal
01904167 → ACNP
Volume
22
Issue
4-5
Year of publication
1999
Pages
783 - 797
Database
ISI
SICI code
0190-4167(1999)22:4-5<783:EOAMCO>2.0.ZU;2-R
Abstract
This greenhouse study aimed to analyze the impact of arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungal associations on maize (Zea mays L. hybrid Pioneer 3905) in ord er to compare their functional compatibility and efficiency. The AM fungus species used for this study were Glomus aggregatum, G. etunicatum, G. mosse ae, and G. versiforme. Shoot and leaf masses, chlorophyll, soluble protein, total and reducing sugar, carbon (C), and nitrogen (N) concentrations, and glutamine synthetase (GS) activity in the maize leaves were analyzed. The root colonization ranged from 26% to 72% depending on the AM fungus species . Leaf mass was significantly higher when maize plants were colonized with G. etunicatum in comparison to the non-AM control. The mycorrhizal effect o n dry leaf mass ranged from 15.9% to 23.9% depending on the AM species. How ever, the total shoot mass did not differ significantly among the treatment s. The mycorrhizal treatment had a marginally significant effect on the chl orophyll concentrations in maize leaves. The protein concentration was the highest in the plants colonized with G. etunicatum and the N percentage was significantly higher in the leaves of plants colonized by G. versiforme or G. aggregatum than those with G. mosseae. However, the AM colonization did not significantly alter the GS activity among the treatments. The highest sugar concentrations were detected in the leaves of plants colonized by G. versiforme. The sugar concentrations as well as the C percentage were lower in the leaves of plants colonized by G. etunicatum compared to the other m ycorrhizal treatments but the values were comparable to the non-AM control. Our overall results suggest that the expression of the mycorrhizal potenti al in the maize host plants varies among AM fungal species.