Public goods theory predicts that government spending an charity can perfec
tly crowd-out charitable contributions. Empirical research has found little
support for the perfect crowd-out hypothesis. However, the empirical work
only measures part of a contributor's total contribution: gifts of money. C
ontributors also volunteer labor. This article extends the public goods mod
el to the case in which individuals contribute both time and money to a cha
rity that in turn produces a public good. The model suggests that charitabl
e contributions of time and money are perfectly substitutable in equilibriu
m. This result offers new interpretations for existing empirical observatio
ns, and suggests a new test of the crowd-out hypothesis. The implications o
f the model are empirically tested using a national survey of charitable ac
tivity. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science S.A. All rights reserved.