Nv. Simon et al., Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy vs. abdominal hysterectomy in a community hospital - A cost comparison, J REPRO MED, 44(4), 1999, pp. 339-345
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the feasibility for an institution to offer laparosc
opic supracervical hysterectomy as a cost-effective alternative to total ab
dominal hysterectomy (TAH) in a managed care environment.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study in which 138 consecutive laparoscopic sup
racervical hysterectomies performed between December 1992 and May 1996 were
reviewed and compared to 354 consecutive TAHs performed during the same pe
riod. Operating time, use of operative room supplies, length of stay and ac
tual total,fixed and variable costs of each case were calculated for the en
tire hospital stay and for each hospital cost center. Differences between c
osts were analyzed by ANCOVA using age, patient weight, specimen weight and
number of operative procedures performed at the time of hysterectomy as co
variants.
RESULTS: The mean operative room time was significantly greater for laparos
copic supracervical hysterecto-my than for TAH (167.4 [SD 51.2] vs. 103 min
utes [30.3, P < .001]). In contrast, length of stay was significantly short
er for laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy than for TAH (0.8 [SD 1.1] v
s. 3.4 days [.9, P < .001]). The adjusted mean costs of both operative room
time and supplies were significantly higher for Zaparoscopic supracervical
hysterectomy than for TAH (P < .001). In contrast, the mean cost of length
of stay for laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy was significantly lowe
r (P < .001). However, the adjusted mean total costs of the entire hospital
stay were not significantly different: $2,716 for laparoscopic supracervic
al hysterectomy vs. $2,702 for TAH (F = .7, P = .8). The absence of signifi
cant differences between procedures resulted from our limited use of dispos
able supplies (no automated stapling device) and from shorter lengths of st
ay, which compensated well for the higher operative room costs Of time and
supplies incurred with laparoscopic suracervical hysterectomy.
CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy is, at least in the sho
rt term, a cost-effective alternative to TAH in a managed care environment.