The research reported in this article sought to provide a broader understan
ding of high school science students as persons by describing the personal
thoughts, or everyday thinking, about a question relevant to science: What
is Nature? The purpose was to gain an understanding of students' fundamenta
l beliefs about the world on the basis that developing scientific literacy
can be successful only to the extent that science finds a niche in the cogn
itive and cultural milieu of students. The theoretical background for this
research came from cultural anthropology and the methodology was interpreti
ve, involving student interviews. The assertions of the study in summary fo
rm were: (a) The ninth-grade students in the study tended to discuss Nature
using several different perspectives (e.g., religious, aesthetic, scientif
ic, conservationist). A rich breadth of perspectives typically characterize
d any one student's discussion of Nature. (b) After 9 years of schooling, h
owever, the level of science integration within everyday thinking remained
low for many of these ninth graders. In their discussions of Nature, most v
olunteered little school knowledge of science. They were aware of school sc
ience topics such as the ozone layer, rain forests, and the Big Bang theory
. Such topics were voluntarily mentioned but usually without elaboration ev
en when asked. (c) Science grade success was not correlated with the concep
ts these ninth graders typically chose to use in a discussion about the nat
ural world. The students with the most grade success in science had not nec
essarily grasped fundamental concepts about Nature and science. (d) Regardl
ess of school grade success, including school science grade success, most o
f the ninth graders attached considerable importance to personal experience
s with Nature. Their environmental inclinations were strong. The article en
ds with a discussion of the implications. (C) 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.