S. Bierma-zeinstra et al., Validity of American College of Rheumatology criteria for diagnosing hip osteoarthritis in primary care research, J RHEUMATOL, 26(5), 1999, pp. 1129-1133
Objective, To study the validity of the American College of Rheumatology (A
CR) criteria for hip osteoarthritis (OA) in patients receiving primary care
. Three different sets of criteria are available, one with clinical symptom
s only, and 2 with clinical symptoms and radiological signs combined. it is
claimed that all 3 sets, separate from each other, can be used to diagnose
hip OA for research purposes,
Methods. Consecutive patients (n = 227) aged 50 years or older, who had con
sulted a general practitioner for pain in the hip and had been referred for
radiographic investigation of the hip. were recruited for a standardized h
istory taking and physical investigation. The radiographs were evaluated ac
cording to a standardized protocol. The cross validity of the 3 different s
ets of ACR criteria was assessed by calculating the percentage agreement an
d the kappa between the separate sets.
Results. There was poor agreement between the set of clinical criteria and
the 2 sets in which radiological signs were included (kappa 0.11 or lower).
The 2 sets th;it included radiological signs showed high agreement (kappa
0.81-0.94, depending on cut off points fur joint space narrowing), These se
ts also showed the highest agreement with the radiological OA defined as a
Kellgren score 2 or more (kappa 0.13-0.48).
Conclusion. The clinical ACR criteria showed no cross validity with the 2 o
ther ACR criteria sets.