Validity of American College of Rheumatology criteria for diagnosing hip osteoarthritis in primary care research

Citation
S. Bierma-zeinstra et al., Validity of American College of Rheumatology criteria for diagnosing hip osteoarthritis in primary care research, J RHEUMATOL, 26(5), 1999, pp. 1129-1133
Citations number
16
Categorie Soggetti
Rheumatology,"da verificare
Journal title
JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY
ISSN journal
0315162X → ACNP
Volume
26
Issue
5
Year of publication
1999
Pages
1129 - 1133
Database
ISI
SICI code
0315-162X(199905)26:5<1129:VOACOR>2.0.ZU;2-F
Abstract
Objective, To study the validity of the American College of Rheumatology (A CR) criteria for hip osteoarthritis (OA) in patients receiving primary care . Three different sets of criteria are available, one with clinical symptom s only, and 2 with clinical symptoms and radiological signs combined. it is claimed that all 3 sets, separate from each other, can be used to diagnose hip OA for research purposes, Methods. Consecutive patients (n = 227) aged 50 years or older, who had con sulted a general practitioner for pain in the hip and had been referred for radiographic investigation of the hip. were recruited for a standardized h istory taking and physical investigation. The radiographs were evaluated ac cording to a standardized protocol. The cross validity of the 3 different s ets of ACR criteria was assessed by calculating the percentage agreement an d the kappa between the separate sets. Results. There was poor agreement between the set of clinical criteria and the 2 sets in which radiological signs were included (kappa 0.11 or lower). The 2 sets th;it included radiological signs showed high agreement (kappa 0.81-0.94, depending on cut off points fur joint space narrowing), These se ts also showed the highest agreement with the radiological OA defined as a Kellgren score 2 or more (kappa 0.13-0.48). Conclusion. The clinical ACR criteria showed no cross validity with the 2 o ther ACR criteria sets.