The recovery of dairy cleaning-in-place (CIP) solutions contributes to savi
ng chemicals, water and energy, maintaining cleaning efficiency, and reduci
ng pH variation and volume of waste stream. The aim of this study was to co
mpare different processes for this particular operation. Industrial cleanin
g solutions were ultrafiltered (300 kg.mol(-1)): membrane performances were
CIP-type dependent. One particular type (alkaline) of CIP solution was tre
ated using decantation, centrifugation and cross-flow filtration (0.1 mu m
microfiltration [MF], 300 and 15 kg.mol(-1) ultrafiltration [UF], inorganic
and organic nanofiltration [NF]). Centrifugation, decantation and 0.1 mu m
MF only removed particles, UF slightly reduced the soluble chemical oxygen
demand (COD); and NF more largely. Increasing the volume reduction ratio (
VRR) (up to 50 here) reduced the volume of sludge, but resulted in a higher
fouling (although always moderate) and a higher organic content of the per
meate. NF is a proper process: membrane performance stabilization when VRR
increased, satisfactory flux (> 100 L.h(-1).m(-2) at 70 degrees C) and the
best pollution reduction. A cascade with pretreatment of the CIP alkaline s
olution by 0.1 mu m MF was detrimental to NF performances. (C) Inra/Elsevie
r, Paris.