The linking of cleanups at contaminated sites in the US to the sites' expec
ted land uses may offer a more rational and cheaper cleanup process, econom
ic development in the local communities that host such sites, and more comm
unity control of cleanups. Interviews with national-level stakeholders, inf
ormation from a large database of contaminated sites, and a detailed case s
tudy suggest these presumed benefits are problematic. Misunderstandings abo
ut the current role of land use in cleanup, the likelihood of economic deve
lopment at contaminated sites, the viability of institutional controls, the
willingness of communities to accept partial cleanups, and public involvem
ent warrant more attention. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reser
ved.