In a recognition memory experiment we recorded event-related brain potentia
ls (ERPs) following the presentation of faces. We compared correctly classi
fied repetitions of faces (hits) with new faces classified as repeated (fal
se alarms). Stimulus-related averaging yielded significantly more negative
ERPs to false alarms between 750 and 900 ms after onset of stimulus present
ation. With response-related averaging we found significantly more negative
ERPs to false alarms within the last 100 ms before movement onset. The dif
ferential activity was distributed over central and frontal regions and was
still present in the period after the response. We interpret the phenomeno
n as an electrophysiological manifestation of false recognition as describe
d by Schacter et al. [16] (Schacter, D.L., Norman, K.A. and Koutstaal, W.,
The cognitive neuroscience of constructive memory, Annu. Rev. Psychol., 49
(1998) 289-318). Fa Ise recognition could be the result of a preliminary de
cision based on illusionary familiarity and be associated with post-retriev
al processing. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.