Ba. Fenderson et al., RELATIONSHIP OF STUDENTS PERCEPTIONS OF FACULTY TO SCHOLASTIC ACHIEVEMENT - ARE POPULAR INSTRUCTORS BETTER EDUCATORS, Human pathology, 28(5), 1997, pp. 522-525
Student evaluation of the faculty is a standard practice in most medic
al schools. Implied in these evaluations is the notion that popular in
structors tie, those considered outstanding by the students) are bette
r educators, whose teaching translates into higher scores for their st
udents on examinations. We tested this hypothesis by comparing Student
s' evaluations of the faculty with levels of academic achievement in a
second-year pathology coarse. Objective measures of academic achievem
ent included scores on final comprehensive examinations, final course
grade, and performance on the United States Medical Licensing Examinat
ion (USMLE). During the 4 years studied (1990 to 1995), students belon
ging to groups with the highest ratings for their instruction performe
d no better than those with the poorest ratings. There uas no correlat
ion between students' perceptions of quality in reaching and their aca
demic achievement. Our results: indicate that students' evaluations of
the faculty are subjective and do not correlate with objective result
s used in the assessment of student knowledge. Popular instructors are
not necessarily better educators. Copyright (C) 1997 by W.B. Saunders
Company.