CHEMICAL SENSORY DEAFFERENTATION ABOLISHES HYPOTHALAMIC-PITUITARY ACTIVATION-INDUCED BY NOXIOUS-STIMULATION OR ELECTROACUPUNCTURE BUT ONLY DECREASES THAT CAUSED BY IMMOBILIZATION STRESS - A C-FOS STUDY
B. Pan et al., CHEMICAL SENSORY DEAFFERENTATION ABOLISHES HYPOTHALAMIC-PITUITARY ACTIVATION-INDUCED BY NOXIOUS-STIMULATION OR ELECTROACUPUNCTURE BUT ONLY DECREASES THAT CAUSED BY IMMOBILIZATION STRESS - A C-FOS STUDY, Neuroscience, 78(4), 1997, pp. 1059-1068
We have shown in previous c-fos studies that noxious stimulation or el
ectroacupuncture in deeply anaesthetized rats activate the hypothalami
c-pituitary corticotrope axis in a specific way. C-Sos expression was
more pronounced in the arcuate than the paraventricular hypothalamic n
uclei, and none occurred in the pituitary intermediate lobe. The absen
ce of the usual autonomic responses to psychological stress, such as t
achycardia or blood pressure elevation, suggested a specific action of
the somatosensory input on the hypothalamic-pituitary axis. To prove
this hypothesis, c-fos expression was examined in the paraventricular,
arcuate and other hypothalamic nuclei, the pituitary gland, and the A
l and A2 medullary catecholaminergic cell groups of animals deprived o
f nociceptive primary afferent input by neonatal capsaicin. After noxi
ous stimulation or electroacupuncture, no c-fos enhancement occurred i
n any of those sites in capsaicin-treated animals, and there was no in
creased plasma release of adrenocorticotropic hormone. In contrast, th
e hypothalamic-pituitary c-fos activation provoked by immobilization s
tress though markedly decreased, was not abolished by capsaicin, where
as plasma release of adrenocorticotropic hormone remained undiminished
. These findings suggest that noxious stimulation or electroacupunctur
e act on the hypothalamic-pituitary corticotrope axis through an exclu
sively physical effect depending on the noxious signal elicited in the
somatosensory pathway. They also demonstrate the occurrence of a mino
r somatosensory physical component after forced immobilization, acting
on the hypothalamic-pituitary axis probably together with the prevale
nt component of emotional arousal elicited by this form of stress. (C)
1997 IBRO. Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.