Observations of oblate hail using dual polarization radar and implicationsfor hail-detection schemes

Citation
Tj. Smyth et al., Observations of oblate hail using dual polarization radar and implicationsfor hail-detection schemes, Q J R METEO, 125(555), 1999, pp. 993-1016
Citations number
40
Categorie Soggetti
Earth Sciences
Journal title
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY
ISSN journal
00359009 → ACNP
Volume
125
Issue
555
Year of publication
1999
Part
A
Pages
993 - 1016
Database
ISI
SICI code
0035-9009(199904)125:555<993:OOOHUD>2.0.ZU;2-J
Abstract
Coincidental radar measurements and in situ ground-truth observations of la rge, oblate hail has allowed new insights into the fall mode of oblate hail stones. The effect of the fall mode upon hail-detection algorithms using mu lti-parameter radar is investigated and discussed, as is the vexed problem of extracting realistic rainfall rates in regions where hail and rain coexi st. Observations presented here show that oblate hail can be associated wit h nonzero values of differential reflectivity, Z(DR), which, together with the coincidental values of the linear depolarization ratio, suggest some de gree of alignment. Although large hail can dominate backscatter through the diameter-to-the-sixth-power dependence, even if it is aligned it makes a n egligible contribution to specific differential phase, K-DP. Rainfall rates extracted using K-DP in the presence of hail are more robust than those us ing the contaminated reflectivity in the horizontal polarization, Z(H), and Z(DR) measurements, but proposed hail-detection algorithms which compare t he observed values of K-DP andZ(H) do seem error prone. The hailstones meas ured in this study were of sufficient dimensions to allow Mie scattering to occur at S-band (Wavelength lambda = 9.75 cm). This served to complicate t he interpretation of the differential-phase measurements. A new hail-detect ion algorithm has been formulated which compares the differential phase pre dicted from Z(H) and Z(DR) With that actually observed. This avoids the pro blem of estimating K-DP from the derivative of a noisy differential-phase p rofile.