Long-term genetic and reproductive effects of ionizing radiation and chemotherapeutic agents on cancer patients and their offspring

Authors
Citation
J. Byrne, Long-term genetic and reproductive effects of ionizing radiation and chemotherapeutic agents on cancer patients and their offspring, TERATOLOGY, 59(4), 1999, pp. 210-215
Citations number
25
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Toxicology
Journal title
TERATOLOGY
ISSN journal
00403709 → ACNP
Volume
59
Issue
4
Year of publication
1999
Pages
210 - 215
Database
ISI
SICI code
0040-3709(199904)59:4<210:LGAREO>2.0.ZU;2-E
Abstract
The continuing search for a cure for cancer has lead to more aggressive the rapies as new agents are developed with largely unknown late complications. Standard therapy for the majority of cancers today, following surgery, oft en consists of combinations of high doses of radiation and multi-drug thera py. Compared with exposures experienced by atomic bomb survivors, cancer su rvivors have been exposed to higher doses of partial body irradiation and c ombination chemotherapy over longer periods. Thus, cancer survivors provide a model system with which to evaluate the long-term effects on the human o rganism of high doses of agents known to damage DNA. Five-year survival aft er cancer diagnosis is now greater than 56%; more than 5 million Americans are considered cured of cancer. However, the late complications of cancer i n long-term survivors has been poorly evaluated, especially in adults, and little is known of the most troubling possibility, that is, that the effect s of cancer treatments could be passed on to the next generation. What litt le we know comes from studies of at most 5,000 survivors of childhood cance r, treated decades ago. So far, results are reassuring that with the means now available, we cannot detect clinical evidence of heritable damage. Howe ver, reproductive effects, including infertility, are common consequences o f cancer therapy and may represent germ cell damage. We are just in the inf ancy of studies of germ cell mutagenesis in cancer survivors. The relativel y small numbers of survivors, and the few types of exposures studied so far , provide only limited grounds for reassurance. More comprehensive, properl y designed, studies of modern new agents are urgently need. (C) 1999 Wiley- Liss, Inc.