Local motion signals have to be combined in space and time, to yield a cohe
rent motion percept as it is involved in a variety of visual tasks. This co
mbination necessarily means to trade-off between loosing spatio-temporal re
solution by pooling local signals and maintaining perceptually significant
segmentation between them. When signals are pooled to detect the presence o
f coherent motion in large amounts of random noise, the question raised is
how the noise affects the perceived quality, in particular speed, of the co
herent motion. Is there an analogy to the well-known reduction in the perce
ived speed of moving gratings at low contrast? Using a two-interval forced-
choice procedure, we have investigated the assessment of speed in random-do
t kinematograms containing different proportions of noise. Under the condit
ions investigated, there is no strong reduction of perceived speed with inc
reasing noise, as long as coherence levels remain well above the thresholds
for directional judgements. This basic result, which could suggest conside
rable but not perfect segregation of signal and noise motion components in
the pooling process leading to speed estimation, is discussed in relation t
o a model that is designed to decode speed from a population of elementary
motion detectors (EMDs) of the correlation type. A strategy to estimate spe
ed from a set of EMDs with a variety of spatio-temporal tuning does not onl
y provide a velocity predictor unambiguous with the spatial structure of th
e stimulus, but also is largely independent of noise. (C) 1999 Elsevier Sci
ence Ltd. All rights reserved.