How generalizable are coronary risk prediction models? Comparison of Framingham and two national cohorts

Citation
Yl. Liao et al., How generalizable are coronary risk prediction models? Comparison of Framingham and two national cohorts, AM HEART J, 137(5), 1999, pp. 837-845
Citations number
29
Categorie Soggetti
Cardiovascular & Respiratory Systems","Cardiovascular & Hematology Research
Journal title
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL
ISSN journal
00028703 → ACNP
Volume
137
Issue
5
Year of publication
1999
Pages
837 - 845
Database
ISI
SICI code
0002-8703(199905)137:5<837:HGACRP>2.0.ZU;2-B
Abstract
Background Previous models used to predict individual risk of death from co ronary heart disease (CHD) were developed from data of 3 decades ago from t he Framingham Heart Study. CHD mortality rates have declined markedly since that period as a result of improvement in both risk factor status and medi cal interventions. Generalization of the results from this one study to the population at large remains a matter of concern. We compared predictive fu nctions derived from the major risk factors For CHD from Framingham and 2 m ore recent national cohorts, the First and Second National Health and Nutri tion Examination Survey (NHANES I and NHANES II). Methods and Results The participants included 1846 men and 2323 women 35 to 69 years of age and free of CHD at the fourth examination (1954 to 1958) f rom the Framingham Study; 2753 men and 3858 women from the NHANES I (1971 t o 1975); and 2655 men and 3050 women from NHANES II (1976 to 1980). The 3 c ohorts were monitored for 24, 20, and 15 years, respectively. Significant h eterogeneity existed among studies in the magnitude of the Cox coefficients For the individual factors (ie, age, systolic blood pressure, serum total cholesterol, and smoking status), especially among men. When risk factors w ere considered collectively, however, functions derived from and applied to different cohorts had a similar ability to rank individual risk. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves were 0.71 to 0.76 in me n and 0.76 to 0.81 in women when different risk functions were applied to t heir own population or to a second population. The cumulative CHD survival observed in women in the 2 national cohorts was close to what was predicted from the Framingham equation. However, Framingham overestimated the cumula tive CHD mortality rates in men in NHANES I and NHANES II. Conclusions The Framingham risk model for the prediction of CHD mortality r ates provides a reasonable rank ordering of risk for individuals in the US white population For the period 1975 to 1990. However, prediction of absolu te risk is less accurate.