Assessment of the US Environmental Protection Agency methods for identification of hazards to developing organisms - Part II: The developmental toxicity testing guideline
L. Claudio et al., Assessment of the US Environmental Protection Agency methods for identification of hazards to developing organisms - Part II: The developmental toxicity testing guideline, AM J IND M, 35(6), 1999, pp. 554-563
Background The effects of toxins on developing animals depend not only on t
he nature of the chemical but also on the timing of exposure and assessment
of outcomes. This complicates the task of regulatory agencies such as the
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), which must comply with the 1996
Food Quality Protection Act to ensure that their standards and policies pr
otect infants and children from environmental toxins. For this task, the Ag
ency relies heavily on scientific data obtained by manufacturers of industr
ial chemicals and pesticides following protocols collected under EPA's Heal
th Effects Test Guidelines.
Methods and Results This article reviews the protocols included in the EPA
guidelines to assess developmental toxicity, which are required for food-us
e pesticides under the core testing battery. We reviewed these protocols on
the basis of their adequacy for identifying hazards to infants and childre
n. Our analysis found limitations in the protocols that hinder their potent
ial for identifying developmental hazards.
Conclusions Methods that the EPA currently depends upon to identify develop
mental toxicity of chemicals have limitations that impede obtaining complet
e and reliable data on which to base regulatory decisions that prefect chil
dren. Other methodological approaches need to be explored as alternatives o
r supplements to the current protocols, Until more accurate resting protoco
ls become available, it may well be necessary under existing laws to employ
safety factors that are more protective of the health of children at all s
tages of development. Am. J. Ind. Med. 35:554-563, 1999. (C) 1999 Wiley-Lis
s, Inc.