Microcystic leydig cell tumors mimicking yolk sac tumor - A report of fourcases

Citation
Sd. Billings et al., Microcystic leydig cell tumors mimicking yolk sac tumor - A report of fourcases, AM J SURG P, 23(5), 1999, pp. 546-551
Citations number
18
Categorie Soggetti
Research/Laboratory Medicine & Medical Tecnology","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY
ISSN journal
01475185 → ACNP
Volume
23
Issue
5
Year of publication
1999
Pages
546 - 551
Database
ISI
SICI code
0147-5185(199905)23:5<546:MLCTMY>2.0.ZU;2-C
Abstract
We report four cases of Leydig cell tumor of the testis with a microcystic pattern that mimicked yolk sac tumor. The patients ranged in age from 27 to 35 years and, except for one tumor that was discovered incidentally, prese nted with testicular masses. All tumors were intratesticular, and three wer e well circumscribed by a rim of fibrous tissue, whereas one showed minor, focal extension into the adjacent testis. The tumors typically had a vaguel y lobular architecture subdivided by fibrous bands. Three of the cases had a complex microcystic appearance caused by individually vacuolated cells an d coalescent cystic spaces; this pattern accounted for the majority of two tumors. Another case had focal collections of Leydig cells with prominent c ytoplasmic vacuoles but lacked the coalescent spaces. The microcyst content s ranged from optically clear to eosinophilic or lightly basophilic, with t he latter having the staining qualities of acid mucopolysaccharide. Three t umors had uniform, bland nuclei and low mitotic rates (<1 mitotic figure pe r 10 high power fields), but one had marked, random nuclear pleomorphism an d an average mitotic rate of five mitotic figures per 10 high power fields. By immunohistochemistry, all were diffusely positive for vimentin; two of three were positive for inhibin, and one showed focal positivity for cytoke ratin (CAM 5.2). All were negative for alpha-fetoprotein and placentalike a lkaline phosphatase and, apart from having microcystic and solid areas, lac ked other features typical of yolk sac tumor. Clinical follow-up ranged fro m 2 months to 2 years with no patient having recurrence or metastasis. The distinction of Leydig cell tumor from yolk sac tumor has important clinical implications because patients with the former usually receive only clinica l follow-up, but the latter often requires chemotherapy.