The authors describe the formation and the academic activities of The
Tufts Managed Care Institute, a collaborative venture of Tufts Univers
ity School of Medicine and Tufts Health Plan, an independent-practice-
association (IPA)-model health maintenance organization (HMO). In 1994
, the dean of the medical school and the CEO of the HMO recognized the
need for collaboration to prepare students and practitioners for high
-quality, cost-effective practice in a managed care environment. They
established an advisory committee to oversee a six-month feasibility s
tudy to interview experts and opinion leaders and identify critical ch
aracteristics of the ideally prepared managed care practitioner. In 19
95, with start-up funding from the HMO, the institute began its operat
ions as a freestanding enterprise with board representation from the t
wo sponsoring institutions. While many of the institute's program have
been developed for practicing physicans and other health care profess
ionals, this article focuses on the academic activities. For medical s
tudents, the approach has been to blend managed care principles and pr
actices into existing courses, problem-based learning cases, and clerk
ships, rather than creating separate managed care courses. For primary
care residents, the institute has a grant to develop managed care cur
ricula in conjuction with Tufts-affiliated residency training programs
. Faculty development is accomplished through dedicated workshops and
seminars, and through increased dialogue between traditional faculty a
nd managed care professionals. In all of its programs and activities t
he institute has fostered greater contact and collaboration between co
lleagues from both sides of the health plan-academia ''divide.'' Opera
tionally, the institute strcture, with dedicated full-time administrat
ive staff, provides the singular focus necessary to establish managed
care education as a top priority for the partnership. At the same time
, sustaining this freestanding organization and infrastructure require
s increased resources. Initial responses to the institute's programs a
nd activities have been positive, both from the local Tufts community
and from external parties. Yet the partnership must establish methods
to evaluate the institute's long-term impact in its efforts to help pr
actitioners succeed in a transforming landscape.