Dimethindene maleate in the treatment of sunburn - A double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study

Citation
K. Schaffler et al., Dimethindene maleate in the treatment of sunburn - A double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study, ARZNEI-FOR, 49(4), 1999, pp. 374-379
Citations number
12
Categorie Soggetti
Pharmacology & Toxicology
Journal title
ARZNEIMITTEL-FORSCHUNG-DRUG RESEARCH
ISSN journal
00044172 → ACNP
Volume
49
Issue
4
Year of publication
1999
Pages
374 - 379
Database
ISI
SICI code
0004-4172(199904)49:4<374:DMITTO>2.0.ZU;2-A
Abstract
The efficacy of topical dimethindene maleate (DMM. CAS 31614-69-5. Fenistil (R) Gel) in the treatment of sunburn was evaluated in a placebo-controlled, 1-period crossover trial in 14 healthy volunteers. An UV-erythema (sunburn ) of a well-defined intensity and extent was experimentally induced on thre e different skin test-areas by means of UV-A/B irradiation with three times the minimal erythema dose (MED). About 24 h after irradiation, one skin te st-area was subjected to a I-h occlusive treatment with DMM gel. the second test area was subjected to treatment with a placebo gel and the third one remained untreated, As objective-quantitative indicators of tenderness, a k ey symptom of sunburn. sensory and pain thresholds to CO2-Laser stimulation and laser somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) In Vertex-EEG were assess ed about 1.5 h postdose. The reaction times (RTs) to painless and painful C O2-laser stimulation (sensory and pain threshold level. respectively) on th e DMM-treated area were significantly longer than RTs to stimulation on the placebo-treated area, Thresholds in terms of laser energy showed no differ ences between the treatments. The SEP N1-amplitude on the DMM-area was mark edly decreased in comparison to placebo. With regard to subjective sensatio ns of pain, itching and tenderness assessed by means of visual analogue sca les (VAS), no clinically relevant differences between treatments were obser ved after sole UV-irradiation. After additional laser stimulation tendernes s was - objectively but not subjectively - decreased on the DMM-area versus placebo. Both gel preparations were well tolerated.