Influence of post-calving supplemental protein on calf performance and reproductive efficiency for beef cows fed silage

Citation
E. Charmley et al., Influence of post-calving supplemental protein on calf performance and reproductive efficiency for beef cows fed silage, CAN J ANIM, 79(1), 1999, pp. 97-106
Citations number
33
Categorie Soggetti
Animal Sciences
Journal title
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE
ISSN journal
00083984 → ACNP
Volume
79
Issue
1
Year of publication
1999
Pages
97 - 106
Database
ISI
SICI code
0008-3984(199903)79:1<97:IOPSPO>2.0.ZU;2-V
Abstract
Protein supplementation for winter-calving beef cows between calving and tu rnout to pasture was studied in two trials. Changes in cow body weight (BW) and condition and calf BW gains were recorded from calving to weaning in t he fall. Reproductive performance was monitored, and in trial 2, milk produ ction was determined. In trial 1, multiparous silage-fed cows were allocate d to one of five levels of corn gluten meal (CGM): 0, 200, 400, 600 and 800 g d(-1). In the second trial, cows were allocated to either restricted or ad libitum silage feeding in combination with three protein supplements: no protein, 400 g d-1 CGM or 475 g d(-1) soybean meal (SBM). In trial 1, cows gained weight during supplementation, but on pasture they lost weight (lin ear effect, P = 0.10). Calf gains and weights at turnout and weaning showed a quadratic response to protein supplementation (P < 0.05). There was a tr end toward a linear decline in days to first service with increasing levels of CGM (P < 0.10). In trial 2, cows on restricted silage feeding lost weig ht (P < 0.05) and body condition (P < 0.10), whereas those fed ad libitum s ilage gained weight and condition. On pasture, this pattern of weight chang e was reversed (P < 0.05). Protein supplementation did not influence BW cha nge but tended to cause a lower body condition score at turnout (P = 0.10). Restricting silage intake to the cow did not affect calf performance, but protein supplementation increased gains both during supplementation and on pasture, thus increasing weaning weights (P < 0.05). When silage was fed ad libitum, SBM was more effective than CGM for increasing calf gain. However , when silage was restricted, CGM was more effective. Restricting silage in take did not impair milk production, but feeding CGM increased milk product ion (P < 0.05). For ad libitum-fed cows, protein supplementation increased pregnancy rate; restricting feed had the opposite effect. Our data suggest that protein supplementation to silage-fed beef cows in good body condition can increase calf performance; however, the level of supplementation is cr itical, and possible adverse effects on breeding have to be taken into acco unt, particularly with cows in negative energy balance after calving.