In numerous tumors, metastasis can be limited to the liver. In non-resectab
le patients, regional treatment modalities, especially arterial cytostatic
infusion, are favored in contrast to systemic chemotherapy, whereas intrapo
rtal or intraperitoneal application is not successful. Improved results wit
h high response rates have been reported after development of intra-arteria
l (i.a.) long-term regimens with FUdR in patients with colorectal liver met
astases using implantable pumps and ports. However, a survival benefit coul
d only be demonstrated in comparison with a control group only treated symp
tomatically. Because of several reports on major local toxicity of i.a. FUd
R treatment (i.e. chemical hepatitis and biliary sclerosis) several other e
ffective i.a. 5-FU regimens have been developed. A randomized study has dem
onstrated superiority of i.a. 5-FU versus i.a. FUdR. In comparison with sys
temic treatment, superiority has only been demonstrated in patients with an
intrahepatic tumor burden of < 25 %. Publications about regional treatment
of patients with breast, gastric cancer or carcinoid liver metastases are
rare. Despite the high response rates reported, the benefit of arterial che
motherapy remains questionable. Overall, local long-term chemotherapy canno
t be recommended outside of studies as a primary treatment. However, extens
ive experience and new drugs support the idea of conducting further regiona
l studies.