Comparing ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty with suction-assisted lipoplasty

Citation
Mk. Gingrass et Jm. Kenkel, Comparing ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty with suction-assisted lipoplasty, CLIN PLAST, 26(2), 1999, pp. 283
Citations number
2
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery
Journal title
CLINICS IN PLASTIC SURGERY
ISSN journal
00941298 → ACNP
Volume
26
Issue
2
Year of publication
1999
Database
ISI
SICI code
0094-1298(199904)26:2<283:CULWSL>2.0.ZU;2-J
Abstract
Ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty (UAL) implies that ultrasound energy is appl ied directly to adipose tissue by means of a probe or cannula, resulting in emulsification of fat. UAL can be performed with either a solid probe or a hollow titanium cannula that vibrates at ultrasonic frequency. Suction-ass isted lipoplasty (SAL) implies that adipose tissue is removed from the subc utaneous space by means of a traditional blunt-tip hollow cannula attached to high-power suction. The purpose of this article is not to debate the mer its of one technique over the other; it is simply to compare UAL and SAL fr om a technical standpoint. Given that most plastic surgeons are familiar wi th SAL and that UAL is still relatively new to US plastic surgeons, the com parison is intended as a jumping board for those who are already proficient at SAL technique who may be interested in expanding their surgical armamen tarium. UAL is not a replacement for SAL; it is more an extension of SAL te chnique.