G. De Menil et al., Real capital market integration in the EU: How far has it gone? What will the effect of the euro be?, ECON POLICY, (28), 1999, pp. 167
Much effort has been devoted to the study of financial market integration i
n Europe. Little is known, however, about real capital market integration -
the degree to which plants and equipment move to take advantage of locally
high returns. This paper looks at the evidence. An analysis of flows of fo
reign direct investment in Europe shows that integration was quite limited
in the early 1980s, but has increased considerably since then. Another anal
ysis looks at rates of return of a large number of firms. It reveals that c
ountry-specific factors play a significant role in explaining corporate ret
urns, poem after taking risk into account. This finding is incompatible wit
h the CAPM definition of market integration. The view that integration is l
imited in Europe is further strengthened when the same approach is carried
out for the USA and Canada. Part of the national specificity appears to be
related to labour and goods market regulations, which harm firms profitabil
ity. If, by introducing more transparency and eliminating currency risk, EM
U strengthens competition on the real capital market, one obvious economic
benefit will be a more rational and efficient use of capital, but the most
important potential consequences are political. Special-interest regulation
s of an exclusively national nature will not survive. They will either fall
in a wave of internationalist liberalization, or became embedded in 'harmo
nized' regulations at the federal level. A reduction in excessive regulator
y burdens, notably in the labour market, could lead to substantial and shar
ed productivity gains.