Program theory oriented evaluations involve construction of a model that de
scribes the logic and context of the program and enables the evaluator to c
heck on program progress and impact before the program is conducted. Such c
onstructions could be done in a multitude of ways: this paper describes the
use of a particular tool called chains of reasoning. Chains of reasoning i
s;a combination of text and a graphic image which presents the activities o
f a program or project, the goals to be attained, additional assumptions an
d the links between them. The paper uses three cases studies from Norwegian
industrial modernization programs to demonstrate the strength of this tool
in different settings. The first case study is a formative evaluation, the
second an impact/summative evaluation and the third an additionality analy
sis. The paper concludes with a discussion of the strengths and weaknesses
of the tool. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.