The history of ablation-behavior experimentation into the central audi
tory system has led to conclusions not obviously derivable from knowle
dge of neuroanatomy or neurophysiology alone. 1) The ventral, and not
the dorsal, acoustic stria is necessary and sufficient for discriminat
ing the physical dimensions of sound. 2) The ventral, and not the dors
al, system is also necessary and sufficient for discriminations of bot
h the azimuth and elevation of a sound source. 3) A functional ''acous
tic chiasm'' is centered in the superior olivary complex, resulting in
the neurobehavioral ''representation'' of each acoustic hemifield onl
y in the contralateral side of the central system (despite the presenc
e of ipsilateral activity). 4) The behavioral usefulness of the ipsila
teral activity present above the superior olivary complex, the role of
the entire dorsal acoustic system, and the role of the descending sys
tem remain unknown. The fact that the only clear structural-behavioral
correspondence yet known is that between the superior olives and soun
d localization seems to suggest that the more fruitful avenues of furt
her inquiry into the roles of the central auditory system might lie in
the more biologic (or Darwinian) as opposed to the physical (or Helmh
oltzian) dimensions of auditory processing.