This study compared one routine Ta-weighted fast spin echo (T2FSE) sequence
with a breath-hold T2FSE (BH T2FSE) sequence of the female pelvis for imag
e quality, uterine anatomy, lesion detection, and signal intensity measurem
ents. Thirty-two consecutive women (mean age 41.7 years) were imaged at 1.5
T with one high-resolution routine T2FSE sequence and one BH T2FSE sequenc
e in the sagittal plane as part of comprehensive pelvic magnetic resonance
imaging. The different image sets were rated separately for imaging charact
eristics (overall image quality, uterine anatomy definition, lesion detecti
on, and free fluid conspicuity) and then compared side by side. The image s
ets were also compared for artifacts (ghosting, blurring, pulsatility, and
chemical shift misregistration). Signal-to-noise (S/N) and signal differenc
e-to-noise (SD/N) ratios were calculated for the different uterine zones, u
terine abnormalities, free fluid, rectus abdominis muscle, and bladder. Con
trast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) were calculated for uterine abnormalities. Twe
nty-eight uterine abnormalities were detected in 20 patients and included l
eiomyomata (13 patients), adenomyosis (7 patients), benign endometrial poly
ps (6 patients), endometrial carcinoma (1 patient), and pregnancy(1 patient
). BH T2FSE was superior or equivalent to T2FSE for overall image quality i
n 23/32 patients (71.8%), uterine anatomy definition in 19/32 patients (59.
3%), and lesion detection in 13/20 patients (65%), BH T2FSE performed less
well than T2FSE for free fluid conspicuity in 5/5 (100%) patients. BH T2FSE
was equivalent to or less affected than T2FSE for ghosting artifact in 24/
32 patients (75%) and blurring artifact in 29/32 patients (90.6%). Pulsatil
ity and chemical shift artifacts were not problematic for either image set.
S/N and SD/N were higher for all BH T2FSE determinations compared with T2F
SE, For the endometrium, junctional zone, myometrium, and bladder, these di
fferences were statistically significant. There were no statistically signi
ficant differences for CNR between the two image sets, although BH T2FSE va
lues for leiomyomata, adenomyosis, and abnormal endometria were higher than
those calculated for T2FSE, All pathology detected with T2FSE was detected
an BH T2FSE despite the breath-hold sequence's inherently poorer spatial r
esolution compared with the non-breath-hold sequence. BH T2FSE may be able
to replace T2FSE for some uterine applications with a substantial time savi
ngs, (C) 1999 Wiley-Liss. Inc.