The stage estimated by clinical FIGO staging is the main determinant in gui
ding the treatment decisions. However, clinical FIGO staging does have inhe
rent inaccuracies, because it does not include significant prognostic facto
rs. Presently, MRI is not officially incorporated in the staging workup sys
tem; however, it is widely accepted as the most reliable imaging modality i
n evaluating cervical cancer and in treatment planning. MRI offers direct t
umor visualization, accurate assessment of the depth of stromal invasion an
d tumor volume, lymph node evaluation, and reliable staging accuracy. Publi
shed reports show the superiority of MRI over clinical staging, and several
recent works on dynamic MRI suggest further improvement of MRI in evaluati
ng cervical cancer.