Assessment of chemokine receptor expression by human Th1 and Th2 cells in vitro and in vivo

Citation
F. Annunziato et al., Assessment of chemokine receptor expression by human Th1 and Th2 cells in vitro and in vivo, J LEUK BIOL, 65(5), 1999, pp. 691-699
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Immunology
Journal title
JOURNAL OF LEUKOCYTE BIOLOGY
ISSN journal
07415400 → ACNP
Volume
65
Issue
5
Year of publication
1999
Pages
691 - 699
Database
ISI
SICI code
0741-5400(199905)65:5<691:AOCREB>2.0.ZU;2-P
Abstract
The preferential association of some chemokine receptors with human Th1 or Th2 cells has recently been reported. III this study, the expression of CCR 3, CCR5, CXCR3, and CXCR4 were analyzed by flow cytometry in three distinct in vitro models of Th1/Th2 polarization, activated naive and memory T cell s, and T-cell clones, in which the intracellular synthesis of interferon-ga mma (IFN-gamma) and interleukin-4 (IL-4) and the surface expression of CD30 and LAG-3 were also assessed. Moreover, by using immunohistochemistry the in vivo expression of CCR3, CCR5, CXCR3, and CXCR4 was examined in the gut of patients suffering from Crohn's disease, a Th1-dominated disorder, and i n the skin of patients suffering from systemic sclerosis, a Th2-dominated d isorder. CCR5 and LAG-3 exhibited the same pathway of Till association, T w hereas CXCR3 did not discriminate between Th1- and Th2-dominated responses. On the other hand, CCR3 was found only occasionally in a small proportion of allergen-specific memory T cells with Th2/Th0 profile of cytokine produc tion in vitro, However, it was neither seen in Th2-polarized activated naiv e T cells nor in established Th2 clones and could be detected in vivo only on non-T cells. Finally, whereas CXCR4 expression was not limited to Th2 ce lls in vivo, it was markedly up-regulated by IL-4 and down-regulated by IFN -gamma in vitro. Thus, the results of this study confirm the existence of f lexible programs of chemokine receptor expression during the development of Th1 and Th2 cells. However, caution is advised in interpreting these recep tors as surrogate markers of a given type of effector response.