D. Ben-nathan et al., Androstenediol and dehydroepiandrosterone protect mice against lethal bacterial infections and lipopolysaccharide toxicity, J MED MICRO, 48(5), 1999, pp. 425-431
The protective effects of the hormones androstenediol (androstene-3 beta, 1
7 beta,-diol; AED) and dehydroepiandrosterone (5-androsten-3 beta-ol-17-one
; DHEA) on the pathophysiology of two lethal bacterial infections and endot
oxin shock were examined. The infections included a gram-positive organism
(Enterococcus faecalis) and a gram-negative organism (Pseudomonas aeruginos
a). Both hormones protected mice from the lethal bacterial infections and f
rom lipopolysaccharide (LPS) challenge, Treatment of animals lethally infec
ted with P. aeruginosa with DHEA resulted in a 43% protection whereas treat
ment with AED gave a 67% protection, Both hormones also protected completel
y animals infected with an LD50 dose of E, faecalis, Similarly, the 88% mor
tality rate seen in LPS challenge was reduced to 17% and 8.5%, by treatment
with DHEA and AED, respectively, The protective influences of both steroid
s were shown not to be directly antibacterial, but primarily an indirect an
titoxin reaction. DHEA appears to mediate its protective effect by a mechan
ism that blocks the toxin-induced production of pathopysiological levels of
tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) and interleukin-1, AED usually ha
d greater protective effects than DHEA; however, the AED effect was indepen
dent of TNF-alpha suppression, both in vivo and in vitro. The data suggest
that both DHEA and AED may have a role in the neuro-endocrine regulation of
antibacterial immune resistance.