D. Lapointe et al., High-Resolution PET imaging for in vivo monitoring of tumor response afterphotodynamic therapy in mice, J NUCL MED, 40(5), 1999, pp. 876-882
Citations number
39
Categorie Soggetti
Radiology ,Nuclear Medicine & Imaging","Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
The aim of this study was to investigate the use of [F-18]fluoro-2- deoxy-D
-glucose (FDG) and a small-animal PET scanner to assess early tumor respons
e after photodynamic therapy (PDT) in mice. PDT consists of int ravenous ad
ministration of a photosensitizer that accumulates preferentially in tumor
tissue, followed by local illumination of the tumor with red light. Two dif
ferent photosensitizers were used: Photofrin (PII), which has been approved
for clinical use, and disulfonated aluminum phthalocyanine (AIPcS), which
is a second-generation drug. These drugs have been shown to induce tumor ne
crosis through different action mechanisms, i.e.,mainly initial vascular st
asis.(Pll) or direct tumor cell kill (AIPcS). FDG PET was used to follow bo
th perfusion and metabolic activity in the tumor tissue. Methods: The study
was performed using a mouse model implanted with two contralateral murine
mammary tumors (5 mm diameter x 2.5 mm thickness) on the back. Only one,tum
or was subjected to PDT, whereas the other tumor served as a control. A tot
al of 13 mice were studied, 1 without illumination, 3 at 30 min and 3 at 2
h after PDT with both PII-PDT and AIPcS-PDT. Dynamic PET imaging of the mic
e, which were placed in pairs ina prostate position parallel to the transax
ial planes of the Sherbrooke animal PET scanner, was performed after a bolu
s injection of ii MBq (300 mu Ci) FDG. Blood samples were collected concurr
ently from I mouse during each study using an automated microvolumetric blo
od sampler. Results: Analysis of the tumor time-activity curves showed that
(a) scans during the first 3 min provided an estimate of tumor perfusion,
as confirmed by the blood samples; (b) the tumor FDG uptake after 15 min wa
s a direct. measurement of tumor metabolism clearly demonstrating the relat
ive efficacy of the two PDT drugs; and (c) the tumor tracer concentration i
n the interval 3-15 min after FDG injection is an appropriate indicator of
the different mechanisms of tumor necrosis through indirect vascular stasis
(PII) or direct cell kill (AlPcS). Conclusion: This pilot study confirmed
the feasibility of using dynamic in vivo PET imaging for assessing early tu
mor response to PDT in mice.