Teleradiology has been used for nearly 3 years at our institution to p
rovide urgent radiologic interpretations for two outpatient clinics an
d an affiliated hospital. The purpose of this study was to evaluate th
e clinical reliability of the existing system, Teleradiology images we
re interpreted using 1600 x 1200 pixel display stations. The original
films from the same cases were subsequently interpreted, usually by an
other radiologist. The initial and final interpretations were compared
. Discrepancies were rated and adjudicated by another senior radiologi
st, These data were compared to peer review interobserver discrepancy
rates. Among the 2688 teleradiology examinations evaluated, there were
major discrepancies in 31 (1.15%). In three instances teleradiology r
ather than film interpretation was considered correct. Abnormalities m
issed on teleradiology were apparent in all but two at adjudication. A
mong the 628 peer-review cases, there were 6 (0.96%) major discrepanci
es, Major teleradiology discrepancy rates are statistically similar to
film-based peer review discrepancy rates, Teleradiology is suitable f
or providing radiologic services to remote medical facilities. Copyrig
ht (C) 1997 by W.B. Saunders Company.