Comparison of the muscle fiber diameter and satellite cell frequency in human muscle biopsies

Citation
F. Maier et A. Bornemann, Comparison of the muscle fiber diameter and satellite cell frequency in human muscle biopsies, MUSCLE NERV, 22(5), 1999, pp. 578-583
Citations number
42
Categorie Soggetti
da verificare
Journal title
MUSCLE & NERVE
ISSN journal
0148639X → ACNP
Volume
22
Issue
5
Year of publication
1999
Pages
578 - 583
Database
ISI
SICI code
0148-639X(199905)22:5<578:COTMFD>2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
Satellite cells are responsible for the formation of postnatal muscle fiber s. The number, mitotic activity, and differentiation potential of satellite cells and the muscle fiber diameter are tightly regulated events in normal muscle. The signal that induces satellite cells to stop proliferation once the determined muscle fiber size has been reached in normal growth is not known. The aim of the present study was to determine whether a correlation exists between satellite cell frequency and muscle fiber diameter in human muscle disease. Muscle biopsies from 7 cases of Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD), 8 other muscular dystrophies, 23 cases of inflammatory myopathy, an d 22 cases of neurogenic atrophy were examined. The satellite cell number w as elevated in DMD and neurogenic atrophy but not in other muscular dystrop hies or inflammatory myopathies. Nevertheless, in all the diseased muscles, but not in normal controls, there was a significantly higher relative freq uency of satellite cells with increasing fiber diameter. It has been shown before that satellite cells show ultrastructural and autoradiographic signs of activation and proliferation in myopathic and neurogenic conditions. We assume that we are dealing with activated, not quiescent, satellite cells in diseased muscle and that under these conditions the fiber diameter does not represent a stop signal for satellite cells to proliferate. The data su ggest that not only the number of satellite cells matters in diseased muscl e, as has been shown before, but that it is their behavior that influences, at least in part, progress and severity of muscle diseases. (C) 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.