Dietary nutrient deficiency in small-scale farming communities in South Africa: Benefits of intercropping maize (Zea mays) and beans (Phaseolus vulgaris)

Citation
E. Mukhala et al., Dietary nutrient deficiency in small-scale farming communities in South Africa: Benefits of intercropping maize (Zea mays) and beans (Phaseolus vulgaris), NUTR RES, 19(4), 1999, pp. 629-641
Citations number
27
Categorie Soggetti
Endocrinology, Nutrition & Metabolism
Journal title
NUTRITION RESEARCH
ISSN journal
02715317 → ACNP
Volume
19
Issue
4
Year of publication
1999
Pages
629 - 641
Database
ISI
SICI code
0271-5317(199904)19:4<629:DNDISF>2.0.ZU;2-J
Abstract
Intercropping is the growing of two or more crops at the same time on a giv en piece of land. Intercropping studies have in the past been conducted wit h a number of crop combinations. The aims of this study were to evaluated i ntercropping of maize (Zea mays L.) and beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) with regard to yield and compare nutrient content in monocropping and intercropp ing. Land equivalent ratio (LER) and Total Nutrient Content (TNC) were used to assess the benefits of intercropping. Grain yields in both monocropping and intercropping were significantly different (P<0.01) with plant density . There was an advantage in intercropping over monocropping as the LER was above 1.0 in all three densities with the medium density having the highest LER. Similar results were found using Total Nutrient Content (TNC). There were significant differences in dietary nutrient content (P<0.01) between i ntercropping and monocropping. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Inc.