Preoperative intra-articular morphine and bupivacaine for pain control after outpatient arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Citation
Je. Tetzlaff et al., Preoperative intra-articular morphine and bupivacaine for pain control after outpatient arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, REG ANES PA, 24(3), 1999, pp. 220-224
Citations number
23
Categorie Soggetti
Aneshtesia & Intensive Care
Journal title
REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND PAIN MEDICINE
ISSN journal
10987339 → ACNP
Volume
24
Issue
3
Year of publication
1999
Pages
220 - 224
Database
ISI
SICI code
1098-7339(199905/06)24:3<220:PIMABF>2.0.ZU;2-1
Abstract
Background and Objectives. The purpose of this study was to determine wheth er intra-articular injection of bupivacaine, morphine, or a combination pri or to surgery provided pain control after arthroscopic anterior cruciate li gament (ACL) reconstruction. Methods. These data were collected as a two-st age prospective, randomized, blinded observer study. All patients received a standard general anesthetic, which included an intra-articular injection 20 minutes prior to incision. In phase I, three solutions were assigned ran domly in a 60-mL volume. Group 1 was saline, group 2 was 0.25% bupivacaine, and group 3 was 0.25% bupivacaine with 1 mg morphine (MS). Phase II was id entical to phase I in technique and had four groups. Group 1 was 0.25% bupi vacaine, group 2 was 1 mg MS in saline, group 3 was 0.25% bupivacaine with 1 mg MS, and group 4 was 0.25% bupivacaine with 3 mg MS. All groups in phas es I and II contained 1:200,000 epinephrine, freshly added. Pain scores wer e evaluated at 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, and 240 minutes postoperative using a vi sual analog scale. For pain scores of 5 or greater, 50 mu g fentanyl was ad ministered at 5-minute intervals until pain was controlled. After transitio n from phase I to phase II of the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), hydrocod one/acetaminophen tablets were used. Results. Thirty patients were entered into phase I of the study. Both treatment groups (2 and 3) had significant (P < .05) pain reduction on arrival to the PACU. Group 3 had significantly (P < .05) reduced need for fentanyl during the PACU stay. Forty-nine patien ts entered phase II of the study. Ln phase II, group 3 had the lowest pain scores on arrival to the PACU. At 120 and 240 minutes, pain scores were low er in groups 3 and 4. Fentanyl and hydrocodone uses were significantly lowe r during the PACU stay in groups 3 and 4. Conclusions. Presurgical injectio n of a solution of 0.25% bupivacaine, morphine, and epinephrine provided pa in control and decreased opioid use in the PACU. Increasing the morphine do se did not improve the clinical result.