Dj. Shaw et al., GASTROINTESTINAL NEMATODE INFECTIONS OF FIRST-SEASON GRAZING CALVES IN BELGIUM - GENERAL PATTERNS AND THE EFFECT OF CHEMOPROPHYLAXIS, Veterinary parasitology, 69(1-2), 1997, pp. 103-116
Comparative analyses of the patterns of gastrointestinal nematode infe
ctions of first-grazing season cattle in Belgium are presented. The an
alysis involves 17 studies covering a 10 year period on 13 different f
arms in Flanders, Belgium. In all studies the calves were divided into
an untreated control group, and one or two groups treated with chemop
rophylactic systems. Two general infection levels emerged-'sub-clinica
l' (14 studies) and 'clinical' (three studies). The 'sub-clinical' inf
ections were characterised by no clinical signs of parasitic gastroent
eritis in the untreated control groups. Mean faecal egg counts remaine
d low (less than 200), maximum pepsinogen levels only reached about 35
00 mU tyrosine, and very small reductions in overall daily weight gain
were observed compared with calves given chemoprophylaxis (less than
40 g day(-1)). Based on these results, on these 'sub-clinical' farms,
chemoprophylaxis may not have been needed. In contrast, multiple salva
ge treatments of the control calf groups were required in the 'clinica
l' infections. Even with these salvage treatments mean faecal egg coun
ts were high (more than 300), maximum pepsinogen levels were over 5500
mU tyrosine and there was a very large reduction in overall daily wei
ght gain (more than 300 g day(-1)). However, it was not possible to pr
edict either at turnout, or during the first month afterwards whether
an infection on a particular farm would develop into a 'clinical' infe
station. With the present data this prediction was possible from 8 wee
ks (Day 56) onwards, based on faecal egg counts and pasture larval con
tamination. It was also possible to predict using serum pepsinogen lev
els on Day 84. Therefore, one possible strategy for the effective cont
rol of gastrointestinal nematode infections of calves in temperate reg
ions would be to evaluate faecal egg counts 2 months after turnout, an
d then only start treatment (i.e. metaphylaxis) if required.