Background: Up to 20% of patients with pancreatic carcinoma subjected to a
bilio digestive diversion, develop a delayed gastric emptying due to duoden
al infiltration. However the role of prophylactic gastrojejunoanastomosis i
s not well defined. Aim: To compare the effects of gastrojejunoanastomosis
performed as prophylaxis or as treatment for duodenal infiltration, in pati
ents with unresectable pancreatic carcinoma. Patients and methods: Between
1983 and 1994, 44 gastrojejunoanastomosis were performed in patients with p
ancreatic carcinoma. In 24 patients the procedure was done as prophylaxis a
nd in 20 as treatment of duodenal infiltration. Of these, three had been su
bjected previously to a bilio digestive diversion. Postoperative outcome an
d mortality of both groups of patients were compared. Results: both groups
of patient had similar sex and age. Operative morbidity and mortality were
33% and 0% in the group wit the prophylactic procedure adn 35 and 10% in th
e group with duodenal infiltration. Oral feeding was started 6.5 and 6.9 da
ys after operation, and hospital stay was 10.7 and 11.4 days in either grou
p. At the moment of the analysis, 95.5% of patients had died. Survival was
significantly longer in the group with the prophylactic procedure (337.2 an
d 116.9 days respectively, p < 0.01). Thirty eight percent of patients requ
ired a further admission to the hospital, but only 4.8% due to gastric rete
ntion. Conclusions: Gastrojejunoanastomosis is a good palliative procedure
in patients with unresectable pancratic carcinoma. It should be performed i
n every such patient who is subjected to a bilio digestive diversion and in
whom a survival of some months can be predicted.