In agreement with many other students of social movements and related pheno
mena, the Goodwin-Jasper critique of political process theorizing about con
tentious politics rightly calls attention to the incomplete, provisional, a
nd sometimes contradictory state of explanations in the field. However, it
wrongly indicates that major analysts are unaware of these difficulties, it
adopts a flawed model of explanation, and it proposes remedies that will a
ctually hinder explanation of contentious political processes.