Measurement of pain

Citation
J. Katz et R. Melzack, Measurement of pain, SURG CL NA, 79(2), 1999, pp. 231
Citations number
111
Categorie Soggetti
Surgery,"Medical Research Diagnosis & Treatment
Journal title
SURGICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA
ISSN journal
00396109 → ACNP
Volume
79
Issue
2
Year of publication
1999
Database
ISI
SICI code
0039-6109(199904)79:2<231:MOP>2.0.ZU;2-Y
Abstract
Clinical investigators have recognized the varieties of pain experience; ho wever, until recently, the methods used for pain measurement treated pain a s though it were a single, unique quality that varies only in intensity. Ap proaches to pain measurement include verbal and numeric self-rating scales, behavioral observation scales, and scales that measure physiologic respons es. The complex nature of pain suggests that these diverse measurements may not always show high concordance. Because pain is subjective, the patient' s self-report provides the most valid measure of the experience, especially when concordance is low. The most frequently used self-rating instruments for pain measurement in clinical and research settings are the Visual Analo g Scale and the McGill Pain Questionnaire. The McGill Pain Questionnaire wa s designed to assess the multidimensional nature of pain experience, and ha s been shown to be a reliable, valid, and consistent measurement tool. A sh ort-form McGill Pain Questionnaire is available for specific research setti ngs when the time to obtain information from patients is limited and when m ore information than simply the intensity of pain is desired. Further devel opment and refinement of pain measurement techniques will lead to increasin gly accurate tools that have more predictive powers.