Clinical investigators have recognized the varieties of pain experience; ho
wever, until recently, the methods used for pain measurement treated pain a
s though it were a single, unique quality that varies only in intensity. Ap
proaches to pain measurement include verbal and numeric self-rating scales,
behavioral observation scales, and scales that measure physiologic respons
es. The complex nature of pain suggests that these diverse measurements may
not always show high concordance. Because pain is subjective, the patient'
s self-report provides the most valid measure of the experience, especially
when concordance is low. The most frequently used self-rating instruments
for pain measurement in clinical and research settings are the Visual Analo
g Scale and the McGill Pain Questionnaire. The McGill Pain Questionnaire wa
s designed to assess the multidimensional nature of pain experience, and ha
s been shown to be a reliable, valid, and consistent measurement tool. A sh
ort-form McGill Pain Questionnaire is available for specific research setti
ngs when the time to obtain information from patients is limited and when m
ore information than simply the intensity of pain is desired. Further devel
opment and refinement of pain measurement techniques will lead to increasin
gly accurate tools that have more predictive powers.